Insults are there because you said I made false claims and lacked sources. That is basically calling me a liar. The sources was easy to look up. Claiming stora

Insults are there because you said I made false claims and lacked sources. That is basically calling me a liar. The sources was easy to look up. Claiming storage costs must be included is moving the goalpost. Gas power plant plus wind is e.g. a perfectly valid choice which cause significant CO2 reductions, and which is entirely cost competitive. Biomass is another viable choice. Many places hydro plus wind and solar is a viable choice. For many using you EV will provide you with storage for a very low cost. With Tesla’s million mile battery, there is minimal cost to using EV battery cycles to power your house when the sun doesn’t shine. Point is, there are tons options and choices and so claiming wind and solar must be paired with storage is disingenuous.