3 ms·
Upvoted for recognition of the difference between academia and reality, and lack of spherical cow assumptions. It's entirely possible that someone might stop a
by iuguy 16y ago
Upvoted for recognition of the difference between academia and reality, and lack of spherical cow assumptions.
It's entirely possible that someone might stop at 14 (for example with NTLM based on an incorrect assumption that as LM stops at 14 characters, so must LM for example).
I guess the point is that security's more probabilistic than deterministic, which means that you can take some measures on a given topic up to a point, then beyond that the payoff decreases to the point where you're wearing a tin foil hat and worrying about the RF conductiveness of tin foil versus the alien ray beams it's supposed to be blocking.
Still, thanks for the interesting conversation, it's one of those things that for me makes HN really worthwhile participating in.
- jtheory 16y agoAn important tweak to the "real world" aspect of cracking passwords -- the attacker is just as capable as the user of reading the advice you give to users when choosing passwords (and what rules you enforce). If you say "longer is better -- nothing else matters" or "think about using a passphrase -- the added length makes your password much more secure!", and you prevent them from using passwords < 10 characters, that's going to influence the attack.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]