> I used the speeding analogy because it shares many similarities: That's so an obvious lie, seriously please be honest. You could use ANY analogy where there'

> I used the speeding analogy because it shares many similarities: That's so an obvious lie, seriously please be honest. You could use ANY analogy where there's no danger, which would then have more similarities, but still decided not to do that? Hell you could even go with going 80 miles an hours in a 60 miles an hour zone and then challenging the legality of that. Why would you go with an infraction that big as an analogy? You chose a dangerous one to break, while there's literally no danger involved in the infringement of Epic. You chose to use theses emotions to support your argument.