3 ms·

In India we have a fixed retirement age. Of course extensions can be granted on an exceptional basis, But in general you serve till a fixed retirement age and r

• manquer 6y ago
  The supreme court structure is very different for india. The strength of court currently is 34 judges and keeps increasing. Any single case goes to a bench of typically 2-3 judges . The largest ever bench was 13 when the 1973 constitution amendment case had come . The idea behind no term limits is, the judge can choose to retire doesn't have to. You have invested a lot of effort in getting a judge to the top as a country. you don't necessarily need a arbitrary date to retire. Each individual has a capacity to serve upto different age unique to them. Setting a common age for all is not efficient, plenty of judges for example are employed in india post 65, in arbitration and government commissions. It makes sense not have term limits when the court size is small. The problem for america is that everything is political: judges and their retirement . In a 2 party first past the post/ winner takes all system that is inevitable.