3 ms·
>It's quite abhorrent to stereotype an entire of party based on the sensationalism of an extremely small subset of actors. Meanwhile the president was just on
by slg 6y ago
>It's quite abhorrent to stereotype an entire of party based on the sensationalism of an extremely small subset of actors.
Meanwhile the president was just on a stage in Minnesota talking about "racehorse theory"[1]. His biographer has previously described it as follows: "The family subscribes to a racehorse theory of human development. They believe that there are superior people and that if you put together the genes of a superior woman and a superior man, you get a superior offspring."[2]
I don't know where I would get the idea that he is in support of eugenics.
[1] - https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1307124621389463553 https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1307124621389463553
[2] - https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-president-superior-genes-pbs-documentary-eugenics-a7338821.html https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-tru...
- giantg2 6y agoAgain, you are using the statements/actions of an extremely small subset to stereotype an entire party (tens or hundreds of millions of people).
- slg 6y agoI am using the words of the president and leader of the party. The party that abandoned precedent a refused to draft a platform in 2020, instead choosing to just support the president.
- giantg2 6y agoSo did he say it while in office? Did he create a policy or direct agencies to engage in eugenics? Please tell me where there is any evidence of a state-sanctioned offense of this nature. Using your logic, we should label the Democrat party the same because under Carter's watch Native Americans were sterilized and the party supports an organization started by a eugenics advocate (Planned Parenthood). Don't forget Biden's comments on race while in office... Hold the perpetrating individuals accountable and stop stereotyping entire classes of people.