3 ms·
> The main problem seems to be a lack of manpower since development of such a software is a massive effort and takes decades of work of highly skilled mathemati
by martinpw 6y ago
> The main problem seems to be a lack of manpower since development of such a software is a massive effort and takes decades of work of highly skilled mathematicians/engineers/programmers
Point of reference. I interviewed with a large CAD software company some time ago. As I was being shown around, the interviewer pointed to an area with maybe 8 developers, and said that was the team that works only on fillets and blends.
One of the key differentiators of high end CAD is how the packages handle edge cases (pun intended) when you have massively complex topologies. It's relatively easy to handle most cases, but there is a long tail of really tricky situations, and that tends to be where the high end tools shine. It's going to be really tough to compete with that given the investment required.
- threatripper 6y agoI think this is why we need an actively developed open source implementation that is backed up by multiple universities in multiple countries. It needs to be so useful and functional that it gains traction in commercial applications a like Blender does.