5 ms·
> That's what Apple chose to do so that's not illegal. Not necessarily. Perhaps it was illegal for Apple to include that clause in their terms in the first pla
by mcherm 6y ago
> That's what Apple chose to do so that's not illegal.
Not necessarily. Perhaps it was illegal for Apple to include that clause in their terms in the first place because it was leveraging their monopoly power in one area to gain dominance in another and this violated antitrust law. This is Epic's claim.
- dpkonofa 6y ago>leveraging their monopoly power Apple does not have a monopoly so that can't possibly be true and the judge has already stated that. If this was true, then Sony, Microsoft, Steam, and even Epic themselves would not be able to sell goods on their own stores. That's ridiculous.