3 ms·

I don't think every startup CEO is falsifying bank statements to show millions more in income to their own finance department and investors than they actually h

• joering2 6y ago
  We simply don't know that. That's what DOJ accuses him of - now we need to wait to hear his side of the story (and his lawyers), unless of course you believe in USA everyone is guilty without being proven of committing said crime?
  • ViViDboarder 6y ago
    A court has an obligation to do that, a random person on the internet has no such obligation. Eventually it will be decided by a handful of random people’s opinions based on the evidence put forth. For
  • stordoff 6y ago
    Something of a nitpick, but you can believe one person is guilty pre-trial without thinking everyone is - there simply needs to be enough evidence to pass your own burden of proof (there's no obligation on a person, outside of a jury, to uphold the 'beyond reasonable doubt' standard), or that you believe there is no room for reasonable doubt even at this stage. A person unconnected to the case commenting online has far less of an impact than a court with the power to impose criminal sanctions, so using a lower standard of proof isn't particularly harmful.