4 ms·
Not at all. Questions of unconscionability, undue influence, whether the contract formed a meeting of the minds, etc, are all up for discussion in court. As wi
by lostcolony 6y ago
Not at all. Questions of unconscionability, undue influence, whether the contract formed a meeting of the minds, etc, are all up for discussion in court. As with any contract. Without undermining the validity of the idea of contracts as a whole.
Maybe you mean the specifics of this case, but until a court decides that, it hardly seems something one is qualified to weigh in on (even if you have a law background or similar).
- drivingmenuts 6y agoI’m definitely an outsider on this. However, Epic surely didn’t enter into this contract blindly; they had to have lawyered this thing backwards and forwards and accountancied it up and down. They’re not some small developer doing a gut-check before rolling over and taking one for the team. From where I sit, it’s looking like they planned to do this for a long time, which leads to the possibility that they entered into the contract in bad faith. As for undue influence, etc. - those are immeasurable terms. Ultimately, if you can’t trust what’s on the paper, what’s the point? I have yet to see a filing where Epic shows that Apple didn’t deliver what they said they would. I have seen the filing where Apple lays out what they did do for Epic.