> Assuming Assange is telling the truth, how would he even know who the ultimate source was? If he received the emails from someone with direct access to them

> Assuming Assange is telling the truth, how would he even know who the ultimate source was? If he received the emails from someone with direct access to them - e.g. someone who worked for the DNC - Occam's Razor would suggest a lack of Russian involvement. (Not saying this is the case, just pointing out one possibility.)