Yes, which makes political appointee DeJoy’s moves to reduce capacity during: 1) an election cycle, that is dependent on vote-by-mail, whose 2) suppression just

Yes, which makes political appointee DeJoy’s moves to reduce capacity during: 1) an election cycle, that is dependent on vote-by-mail, whose 2) suppression just so happens to favor the politician who appointed him, whose 3) job security hinges upon his reelection, and 4) his non-zero chance of facing criminal charges for his role in this. Is there an interpretation of this situation that they were acting in good faith? Sure, but given the brazen, unchecked corruption of the last 3.5 years, such an interpretation, to put it mildly, is undeserved.