6 ms·
This was pretty much guaranteed. There were multiple studies showing that UVC (not Far-UVC) quickly and effectively killed coronavirus. It was basically just cr
by remote_phone 6y ago
This was pretty much guaranteed. There were multiple studies showing that UVC (not Far-UVC) quickly and effectively killed coronavirus. It was basically just crossing the t’s and sorting the i’s to test Far-UVC light that it did the same thing. But based on everything else it was obvious it would.
I’m hopeful we can see a lot of low cost Far-UVC appliances over the next year that safely killed coronavirus in indoor places so that we can start living a normal life before vaccines become widespread.
- DenisM 6y agoThere’s money to be made in spectrometers conforming proper spectrum of a given device. The market will be flooded by cheap lights, and most of them will be cutting every bit of cost to turn profit.
- AstralStorm 6y ago222 nm UVC LEDs are cheap enough. Cost cutting is in number of them, power, cooling and looks of the lamp.
- ecesena 6y ago> 222 nm UVC LEDs are cheap enough To my knowledge they don't exist yet. Do you know of any manufacturer that produces them?
- richajak 6y agoIt does not have to be 222nm UVC, actually the most common ones available in the market, 254nm, can also kill the virus. However, the researchers claim that the 222nm is safer. This article is a bit sensational.
- bwilli123 6y agohttps://sites.google.com/view/far-uvccoronavirus/home https://sites.google.com/view/far-uvccoronavirus/home https://medi-immune.com/protectivair/ https://medi-immune.com/protectivair/
- bwilli123 6y agohttps://medi-immune.com/protectivair/ https://medi-immune.com/protectivair/ from April