4 ms·
It wasn't a "reasonable speculation". More like pure fiction, simply intended to denigrate the target.
by jfk13 6y ago
It wasn't a "reasonable speculation". More like pure fiction, simply intended to denigrate the target.
- fwn 6y agoYou criticised their guess as baseless just to follow up by denying their numbers without sources. Only one of you two chose to present a fact without backing it up. There's also this gesture of assuming that the opponent is motivated by evil intentions, which is almost always wrong. On topic though: Our conversation could really benefit from some actual numbers. I made a quick search but didn't find anything.
- jfk13 6y agoA quick search turned up this for me: https://blog.mozilla.org/firefox/the-new-firefox-by-the-numbers/ https://blog.mozilla.org/firefox/the-new-firefox-by-the-numb... It's a bit dated, but at the time of the Quantum release, > How many authors contributed code? > More than 700 authors contributed code to Firefox ... and I guess the majority of those code authors were working for Mozilla. It seems unlikely there's been a 90% reduction in the engineering effort being put into Firefox in the last couple years.