3 ms·
I assume that's because a sufficient number of people vouched for them and commented on them because they were posted a little earlier. (the alternative, that
by justin66 6y ago
I assume that's because a sufficient number of people vouched for them and commented on them because they were posted a little earlier. (the alternative, that people possess an extremely strong preference for the Financial Times, strikes me as unlikely) It's not a big deal, but I do hope people who are flag-happy lose that ability in short order, since it's really not a feature that ought to be used very often.
- detaro 6y agoIf there are already running threads on the topic (and looking at them, commenting started pretty much immediately), duplicates don't do the sites any good (and are not supposed to even be submitted), so flaggin them is not a problem IMHO, although it is good custom to add a comment pointing to the already existing threads.