4 ms·
I think part of it is the source. Fox News, or Huffington Post as another example, are arguably pretty biased in their coverage.
by lallysingh 6y ago
I think part of it is the source. Fox News, or Huffington Post as another example, are arguably pretty biased in their coverage.
- dleslie 6y agoIt is the primary source; he made the claim while interviewed by Hannity.
- sudosysgen 6y agoYou always have to take bias in context. If the source is claiming that someone said something to them in an interview and the person agrees, then bias is irrelevant.
- rs999gti 6y agoFox News actually reports news from the news wires and the local Fox new station affiliates. I think that gives Fox News a bit more credibility than HuffPo, which sometimes reads like Gawker. Though they are still both very partisan.
- DangerousPie 6y agoThen why not link to the news wires directly?
- throwaway0a5e 6y agoBecause the interview in question was conducted by Fox News.
- 50ckpuppet 6y agoand Fox News wouldn't run the interview if they didn't like the results, so in that sense they are biased, just like NPR,PBS,CNN,MSNBC and everybody else.
- merpnderp 6y agoBecause Assange made the claims on Fox News. This is the source.
- dalbasal 6y agoJeez! Click the link before criticizing it. It's a primary source, an interview with Assange. It's not a wire reprint.