3 ms·
From a policy perspective, the states HAS to say this. Wisdom of the particular policy aside, once a country makes a really bold demand - "do X or we'll do Y"
by curiousllama 6y ago
From a policy perspective, the states HAS to say this.
Wisdom of the particular policy aside, once a country makes a really bold demand - "do X or we'll do Y" - they can't back down without losing a tremendous amount of credibility. If you don't follow through on your threats, they're meaningless; if your threats aren't meaningful, only action is. Action is more expensive, so it costs you more to accomplish a goal, so you can accomplish less.
I happen to think this particular policy is unwise (dude, you need allies, and you think Europe won't help you regulate tech? C'mon), but the US has committed. Barring judicial intervention, it would be more unwise to back down now.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- hawthornio 6y agoWell I guess it’s a good thing we didn’t back down on building a wall and making Mexico pay for it by that logic. /s I don’t think this reasoning makes sense. Wouldn’t it be better for the US to back down, showing that we are judicial and fair country that doesn’t lash out in petty ways? Trump makes insane claims all the time; no one would take any notice if he didn’t follow through on this one either.