4 ms·
"have you got any..." -duude! just open facebook messenger and inspect any element there, then comeback and tell me if you can't see the gazzilion DIV's there.
by unnouinceput 6y ago
"have you got any..." -duude! just open facebook messenger and inspect any element there, then comeback and tell me if you can't see the gazzilion DIV's there.
Or are you referring to table vs. div from performance point of view? For that you can do your own testing. Create a DB, put in there 100k rows and then view them via a framework that uses the gazzilions I mentioned vs a table with 100k TR's. See for yourself which one loads faster. And to get out the loading times from DB, do it once then save it as HTML offline page for both tests and then use those pure HTML to load from local file. See that TABLE is faster.
- cblconfederate 6y agoI thought they did that on purpose, to evade scrapers and ad blockers.
- maccard 6y ago(sorry should have been clear - im talking about the performance of div soup vs a table) I'm aware how to put together those benchmarks, but you're the person making the claim. The onus is on you to prove its faster, not me.
- unnouinceput 6y agoI already proved to myself, exactly like I told you. And since you can do it yourself, then do it. Don't take my word, test yourself. Then comeback and tell me the results of your own benchmark.
- maccard 6y ago> I already proved to myself, exactly like I told you. No, you didn't. You made a claim, and then stated it was true based on your description, not based on the results. > Then comeback and tell me the results of your own benchmark. You're the person who is claiming it's faster. As I said above, The onus is on you to prove its faster, not me.