>you use an entire mix of different technologies and strategies to solve this problem. Like what? What's the mix? And why is nobody doing it? >It's just not

>you use an entire mix of different technologies and strategies to solve this problem. Like what? What's the mix? And why is nobody doing it? >It's just not a practical concern for the next 20 years. Because they use coal, natural gas, nuclear, hydro or geothermal ... You know power sources that can actually power a modern economy. >Medium term storage needs are trivially met with power to gas (both hydrogen and methane), short term storage needs can be solved via batteries, compressed air or thermal storage. You keep using words like 'trivial' when no nation is actually building this kind of infrastructure. No nation even has plans to build this infrastructure. >All of these technologies have been available for a long Yes. Therefore it should make you question why they aren't being used. Perhaps they aren't because they don't work at grid-scale?