7 ms·
That's a good question. Contractual obligations with Spotify? I've been pondering this for a while. It does seem somewhat plausible because some of the episodes
by hervature 6y ago
That's a good question. Contractual obligations with Spotify? I've been pondering this for a while. It does seem somewhat plausible because some of the episodes removed weren't controversial. Rogan also hasn't commented on this. It's also unclear whether he would deny it even if it was false. I've also been wondering why would Alex Jones lie about this? If he was going to create a narrative, I would expect it to have some crazy "Democrat elite controlling the media" bend to it.
- ALittleLight 6y agoHow does that make sense as a contractual obligation? "You can leave some episodes up on YouTube to attract more fans... BUT you can never publicly explain why you're doing so directly, though feel free to tell your friends and they can tell the public."
- hervature 6y agoBecause the episodes are supposed to come down off Youtube later. It could also be that Rogan is supposed to keep quiet until Spotify can decide how best to proceed and if they want to reinstate other episodes (which they have already done). Joe speaking out of turn could be bad for Spotify.