He has talked about this at length (its was most of one of the episodes), or rather his guest did. Its a lot more nuanced, the conversation on that particular

He has talked about this at length (its was most of one of the episodes), or rather his guest did. Its a lot more nuanced, the conversation on that particular episode was about whether _children_ are both mature enough and not likely to change their opinion about having hormone therapy/etc, frequently before puberty. And the situation those children's parents find themselves in, and how much of that situation is the child seeking a transient identity to belong to or various other reasons that I suspect a lot of people find to be red flags. Much like a lot of JRE conversations, certain things are condemned, usually outlandish things everyone can agree are outlandish, but he also notes that there are reasoned counter points, and he is willing to concede on them. The result is a gray line that no one who actually listens to these conversations can frequently conclude is coming down hard one side.