He gets hate for the same reason he gets love. Because he doesn't toe the state history propaganda line we are all spoonfed. That doesn't mean he isn't biased.

He gets hate for the same reason he gets love. Because he doesn't toe the state history propaganda line we are all spoonfed. That doesn't mean he isn't biased. After all history is interpreted propaganda. But he does point out some "inconvenient truths". > Curious how so many self styled "contrarians" and "free thinkers" dislike his work without reading it. There is a lot less of this here than you think. I think the name of site is misleading you.