> You mean you want the courts to moderate your social platform? Honestly? Yes. At least that way there's impartiality, accountability, an appeals process, and

> You mean you want the courts to moderate your social platform? Honestly? Yes. At least that way there's impartiality, accountability, an appeals process, and enforcement. If Facebook self-moderates you get all of the same downsides of "big government"[1] moderation and none of the benefits listed above. [1] I assume your argument is predicated in terms of "big government" as though an unregulated and for-profit company having a near-monopoly on key parts of modern society is somehow superior to any kind of state involvement in reigning-in excesses that the free market fails to address.