3 ms·
That's a straw man argument, just because an employee isn't allowed to bring politics to work doesn't mean they can't be politically active on their own time.
by reader_mode 6y ago
That's a straw man argument, just because an employee isn't allowed to bring politics to work doesn't mean they can't be politically active on their own time.
- munificent 6y agoSo individuals can do recreational politics but corporations are free to sink as much of their resources into it as they want? Is your claim that we really need more corporate control over politics in the US and less citizen participation?
- newcomputer 6y agoIndividuals are also free to sink as much of their resources into it as they want. The fact of the matter is political conversations have high risk of annoying/frustrating/alienating their participants. To have these conversations at work is just making employees less productive and asking for a controversy.
- namuol 6y ago> To have these conversations at work is just making employees less productive and asking for a controversy. I dare say it might be time for some employees at Facebook to pause and think about how their work may have an impact on the world.
- fxtentacle 6y agoThat would be frustrating. And it might lower their productivity. As Facebook, I'd rather pay for some yoga classes so that people don't have time to think about their actions.
- kelnos 6y agoI'm not the parent you're replying to, but I think we're talking about two different things here. I agree that there's no need to bring up politics in the break room (or worse, during active work) and risk alienating people. It's a bad idea, just like talking about or advocating for particular religious beliefs. But if your company is being politically active in ways you find unethical, I don't think it's reasonable to expect people to just put their heads in the sand, ignore it, and get their work done. And not everyone has the luxury of quitting a job whenever their don't agree with the company's politics.
- rguiliani 6y agoLol. You are a privileged retard.
- Talanes 6y agoAnd you believe that people being asked to quietly do work for a company advancing politics they disagree with are going to be MORE productive? I know I'd be quietly fuming and doing minimal work for weeks after a mandate like that.
- kelnos 6y agoI don't think it is. If the corporation is going to be donating to groups and lobbying politicians in support of certain policies, are employees who are strongly against those policies supposed to just shut up, ignore it, and do their work? I'm lucky that I'm in a place financially and career-wise that I can just quit and find a new job if I disagree with my company's politics, but many others don't have that luxury. Their choices are either to talk about it and try to get their company to change, or feel awful keeping quiet.