Population goes up, useful land does not. That’s why we’re paving suburban farmland and cutting and burning rainforests and even going to war. I agree that spac

Population goes up, useful land does not. That’s why we’re paving suburban farmland and cutting and burning rainforests and even going to war. I agree that space makes Antarctica and Death Valley look inviting, and major settlements in those places would be good practice, but how feasible is that while we’re limited to a share of the energy and resources readily available on Earth?