3 ms·
> but a lack of confirmed scientific data shouldn't paralyze us Huh? That was not the point in contention. You said "the only conclusion is that the herd immun
by mbesto 6y ago
> but a lack of confirmed scientific data shouldn't paralyze us
Huh? That was not the point in contention. You said "the only conclusion is that the herd immunity numbers must be wrong" but have shown no evidence whatsoever to back that up.
- modeless 6y agoYou're putting words in my mouth; I did not say that at all. I asked "what explanation is there". I think a good discussion has resulted with some good points being made and some good data being shared.