3 ms·
> I'm sick of companies building their products off the backs of the personal/hobbiest/small business market, and then when they get enough recognition and buz
by Hokusai 6y ago
> I'm sick of companies building their products off the backs of the personal/hobbiest/small business market, and then when they get enough recognition and buzz, switch to essentially an "enterprise-only" pricing structure, completely screwing over the users who made them successful in the first place.
As someone said on the Internet, what you are sick of is capitalism. Because that is how basically business work. You get a customer base, but as your company grows you leave the less profitable customers behind. And, it makes a lot of economic sense.
As, I think that capitalism works. Maybe the solution is to remove part of the software from the market. Many institutions (schools, universities, or even the military) could spend resources on creating the tools that their students, and society as a whole can use. The goal would be more aligned with citizens needs instead of maximizing profit.
At the same time, companies can still capitalize on the different needs of the enterprise software. So, business continuation is assured.
Our current problem is that almost all platforms are designed for profit but platforms, by definition, are foundations. And that foundations not only are used for businesses but also for society.
It is the equivalent of a country were all streets and roads are private. And, the owners can decide who passes or not by their streets, and how much they pay. That is extremely good for businesses, not so good to grow an economy or a free society.
- zozbot234 6y agoCapitalism is fine. FLOSS software is also part of a capitalist market after all, especially via crowdfunding sites like Kickstarter, Indiegogo, Patreon etc. Mostly, what we need is more real competition and less focus on monopoly platforms as the only kind of "success" in this market.
- Hokusai 6y ago> Mostly, what we need is more real competition and less focus on monopoly platforms as the only kind of "success" in this market. Platforms are inherently monopolistic. Network effect is key. The most popular platforms have more users that provide support, because most support for software is done for free by experts in their spare time. The most popular platforms also are more in demand for jobs. So, future practitioners learn the most on demand platforms increasing the number of users of that platform. And the point of the parent comment, once a small platform becomes popular it abandons its small users to move to the more profitable enterprise layer leaving many people without access to the tool that they have spend time promoting, learning and supporting. It does not work.
- zozbot234 6y ago> Platforms are inherently monopolistic. Network effect is key. Not so. Federated and decentralized platforms do not involve any monopoly.