4 ms·

Bungie did a similar thing with Destiny 2, as you now need to login with Steam, not Battle.net. It happens that more people have Steam accounts so it didn’t ups

by easton 6y ago

Bungie did a similar thing with Destiny 2, as you now need to login with Steam, not Battle.net. It happens that more people have Steam accounts so it didn’t upset too many people, but how is this different? It seems like people are just finding reasons to get mad at Psyonix instead of pushing hard on the big issues, like dropping Linux support.

xwdv 6y ago
Ranting against things that require you to have something in order to play is a much better signal of your virtues these days.
- LanceH 6y ago
  People are ranting about things they have to have that weren't required when they paid.
  - xwdv 6y ago
    Maybe they should have read the terms of service.
SketchySeaBeast 6y ago
The difference, to me at least, is that you can't find Destiny 2 on Battle.net anymore - they entirely switched platforms. This is an end run around sneaky where they require you to have your steam account AND an epic account, so you can't play a steam game without an epic account - with Destiny 2 whatever platform you were on you needed a matching account. Now why is this egregious while Ubisofts uplay launcher isn't? I'm not sure. I assume it's just because uplay has always been there and awful, and this is new.
- esyir 6y ago
  Part of the issue is that rocket league was cross platform if I recall correctly. Then epic comes in, buys it out and screws the potatoes who bought it on the competitor platform.