4 ms·
In fairness, they are held to a much higher standard. It's just that the vast majority of products out there are horrible, so when consumers get products like A
by bilbo0s 6y ago
In fairness, they are held to a much higher standard. It's just that the vast majority of products out there are horrible, so when consumers get products like Apple makes they seem heavenly by comparison. And they are, but does that mean they are the best they can be?
Probably also has a bit to do with Apple actually making efforts to improve, whereas others seem to make efforts only to copy Apple. Which doesn't help the situation. For consumers, the ideal, in my opinion, is competition on innovation, not really competition on who can be more "Apple-like".
- leephillips 6y agoHigher than what? I respectfully disagree: https://web.archive.org/web/20090414133729/http://tomkarpik.com/articles/massive-data-loss-bug-in-leopard/ https://web.archive.org/web/20090414133729/http://tomkarpik....
- GiorgioG 6y ago> In fairness, they are held to a much higher standard. With premium prices come premium expectations. If I buy a $3,000 MacBook Pro, I do not expect the colossal screwup that was the butterfly keyboard design defect. That's a hardware issue of course, but in general Apple's software quality has gone down, down down.