4 ms·
sure, and it's the argument that it's swinging back in the favour of centralised control that I don't buy. I look at major enterprises quickly adopting what ar
by raesene9 6y ago
sure, and it's the argument that it's swinging back in the favour of centralised control that I don't buy.
I look at major enterprises quickly adopting what are still quite new technologies, a good example being the uptake of things that come under the cloud native banner and that doesn't tell me that things are becoming more centralised/controlled.
I've spoken to multiple security teams looking at container security who've said things along the lines of "this is getting deployed whether we want it or not, so we're doing our best to keep up"
Ofc my examples will just be anecdotal, but that's what I'm seeing.
- thinkharderdev 6y agoYeah, I would mostly agree. I have noticed personally at my (largish) company a bit of a shift back towards centralized control, but only slightly. One thing that does seem very different now is that there is a lot more pressure on the vendors of SAST and other security products to support newer tech stacks. And if the big boys won't then there are always a huge number of smaller players ready to jump in to take advantage of that opening. The number of products just in the Serverless space offering "next-gen" WAF solutions is pretty amazing given how recent large scale adoption of Serverless stacks has been.