FTA: > Overall, non-response increased significantly and was more strongly associated with income than in previous years, with non-response decreasing with inc

FTA: > Overall, non-response increased significantly and was more strongly associated with income than in previous years, with non-response decreasing with income, meaning that income data could be skewed higher than it actually was. I don't see how calculations would trend in a particular direction if they weren't literally collected in this calendar year. It's still confusing as hell. Also, is this addendum, by the census themselves: > When correcting for non-response bias in 2019, the Census found that real median income was $66,790, 2.8% lower than reported in the official release.