> That's why democracies generally divide districts by population. Geography is largely irrelevant. That's kind of my point: No it is not. Districts are meant

> That's why democracies generally divide districts by population. Geography is largely irrelevant. That's kind of my point: No it is not. Districts are meant to be contiguous geographical areas. Even if you adjust the geographical size of each district to have similar population sizes (which was your point), my point still stands: Because of the geographical nature of districts, cities will always have a larger Democratic percentage, and it will always look like Republicans have gerrymandered things.