> "You probably meant to say 'convenience' instead of 'connivance' but your misspelling perfectly captures my sentiment about Audible." I didn't see the origin

> "You probably meant to say 'convenience' instead of 'connivance' but your misspelling perfectly captures my sentiment about Audible." I didn't see the original, but that wording is absolutely not abusive (except maybe to Amazon, which deserves it). Nor is it any kind of "dismissal of a honestly presented comment", "trivial and unfair" or otherwise. > my sentiment about Audible. So that would be "The value with the lock-in (connivance, price) makes it worthwhile to Amazon."? Sounds about right.