4 ms·
I sympathize with this view, but the very example given contradicts the thesis that this bubble will leave no technology in its wake. Hadoop was developed at Y
by strlen 16y ago
I sympathize with this view, but the very example given contradicts the thesis that this bubble will leave no technology in its wake.
Hadoop was developed at Yahoo, an advertising supported company. Some of the most interesting contributions (HDFS sync, RaidNode, AvatarNode) have come from Facebook, an ad supported company. Hadoop's architecture itself is inspired by the MapReduce and GFS papers from Google, another ad supported company. This shows that the premise is false: there is indeed technology transfer from the "hot businesses" to other companies and academia. Hadoop is the prominent example, but not the only one: many contributions to the Linux kernel come from Google, both Google and Facebook have also contributed extensively to MySQL.
The ad ranking and recommendation algorithms themselves are also by no means trivial, much of the work that goes on in that field (machine learning, information retrieval, natural language processing, large scale graph processing) is applicable elsewhere. The "math wiz" college graduates working on these fields, are going to be able to apply the skills they build elsewhere. Not to mention, the stock options, even if we assume modest outcomes, could pay for many a Ph.D. for engineers who wouldn't otherwise afford to take the time off from industry.
There are also products like GroupOn that don't seem to be technology driven at all, but that can change rather radically (e.g., Amazon's move from a technology consumer, to a producer of their own technology, to a company selling technology to others).
In other words, one doesn't have to sell technology to businesses in order to build technology that benefits others. There's nothing wrong with selling technology to businesses (and if I were to start my own company, I'd start one that does that, because I understand e.g., distributed databases and market for them better than I understand, e.g., machine learning and consumer marketing), but there's nothing wrong with providing an ad supported service to consumers, as long as interesting and universally applicable technology gets built in the process.
- 6ren 16y agoA nice thing about Google is that its interests have been aligned with the public good: more internet access, more websites, more blogs, more webapps. (Their interests are now diverging a bit, as they try to extract more personal information. Facebook did a nice trick where people actively give them their personal information...) Not sure if the alignment is as deep for Facebook - more people with internet benefits them, but does more internet content?
- pedalpete 16y agoI agree with you, though I think we are as yet unable to point to the actual differences the supporting technologies have created in our lives. It's easy to point to the invention of the internet, microchips, battery technology, etc. etc. Telling somebody about Hadoop and how it is changing the world is more difficult for the average person to grasp.