3 ms·
When you corrected your spelling mistake ('connivance'), my comment became useless so I removed it. You are dismissing other's concerns about walled gardens so
by abawany 6y ago
When you corrected your spelling mistake ('connivance'), my comment became useless so I removed it. You are dismissing other's concerns about walled gardens so it seems a bit hypocritical to call my contribution negative.
- chrisseaton 6y agoIn was worded in an abusive way. And spelling isn't material to any argument.
- abawany 6y agoMy comment as I recall was: "You probably meant to say 'convenience' instead of 'connivance' but your misspelling perfectly captures my sentiment about Audible." I'm sorry if you thought that was worded abusively but that wasn't my intention.
- a1369209993 6y ago> "You probably meant to say 'convenience' instead of 'connivance' but your misspelling perfectly captures my sentiment about Audible." I didn't see the original, but that wording is absolutely not abusive (except maybe to Amazon, which deserves it). Nor is it any kind of "dismissal of a honestly presented comment", "trivial and unfair" or otherwise. > my sentiment about Audible. So that would be "The value with the lock-in (connivance, price) makes it worthwhile to Amazon."? Sounds about right.