3 ms·
No comment on the HEPA ventilator, then? :) My father is significantly at risk; I'd much rather he wear an inexpensive HEPA ventilator (99.97%+ vs. 95% suppre
by pjkundert 6y ago
No comment on the HEPA ventilator, then? :)
My father is significantly at risk; I'd much rather he wear an inexpensive HEPA ventilator (99.97%+ vs. 95% suppression, fresh air, ...), than even an N95. Wouldn't you?
And what exactly to "people like me" deserve? I'm used to being hated by both right- and left-wing people, so I'm OK -- but who's going to give "it" to me?
Edit:
FYI: https://www.hamilton-medical.com/en_US/E-Learning-and-Education/Knowledge-Base/Knowledge-Base-Detail~2020-03-18~Efficiency-of-HEPA-filters~d5358f88-753e-4644-91c6-5c7b862e941f~.html https://www.hamilton-medical.com/en_US/E-Learning-and-Educat...
Note especially the effectiveness of HEPA vs. particulates in the size range of SARS-CoV-2...
If this is rated HEPA in the US, this must provide 99.97%+ filtration in the "worst" particulate size, 0.3micron, and apparently even better in the .06 to .2 micron SARS virus size: https://www.amazon.ca/AirPro-Rechargeable-Electrical-Purifying-Respirator/dp/B07YWLBVF2/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=hepa+respirator+mask&qid=1600290517&sr=8-1 https://www.amazon.ca/AirPro-Rechargeable-Electrical-Purifyi...
Its a hundred bucks... Why not opt for this option for people at high risk from viral respiratory illnesses? Why the push-back, here?