4 ms·
Yeah, I agree that not elaborating on this was unfortunate (but elaborating would be tangential, as relatively few people are familiar with Emacs Lisp). I thin
by matklad 6y ago
Yeah, I agree that not elaborating on this was unfortunate (but elaborating would be tangential, as relatively few people are familiar with Emacs Lisp).
I think Emacs Lisp is in the "easy to improve upon" category because of:
* lack of namespaces
* dynamic binding by default
* spartan standard library
I do love parenthesis though :)