3 ms·
It's still significantly less expensive than OnShape, which seems like its closest competitor. Unfortunately it's hard to actually differentiate between "hobbyi
by krschultz 6y ago
It's still significantly less expensive than OnShape, which seems like its closest competitor. Unfortunately it's hard to actually differentiate between "hobbyist" and "small company" without cutting some really critical features. Most people, even professionals, just don't use that much of the overall feature set.