3 ms·
Edit: Realized what I was tring to say: Intuitive might be the wrong thing to chase. Intuitive to who? :) Trivial programs are trivial. We might be stuck in
by sreekotay 6y ago
Edit: Realized what I was tring to say: Intuitive might be the wrong thing to chase.
Intuitive to who? :)
Trivial programs are trivial.
We might be stuck in the BCPL derived syntax that trade a false notion of intuitive for complexity of implentation and maintenance.
(And I do mean might --- it's not hard not to think incrementally from the languages we know) --- but "inituitive" is EXACTLY the problem: I guess I was arguing we might consider searching for simple and predictable (even if that comes at the cost of slightly higher initial learning?)
- sreekotay 6y agoe.g. maybe write it as "b * c += a" ? ... lol full on LR - no ambiguiity.