2 ms·
Previous articles mentioned that the driver has some tablet device(s) to watch, to monitor what's happening with the AI. The last PR piece seems to omit that.
by user5994461 6y ago
Previous articles mentioned that the driver has some tablet device(s) to watch, to monitor what's happening with the AI.
The last PR piece seems to omit that. Next piece maybe we will find out the driver was watching hulu on their phone on their lap... while reclassifying objects on the AI tablet also on their lap.
- lhorie 6y agoOk, but what I'm curious is whether the monitoring/classifying/whatever was done in real time with the vehicle in motion, or after the fact. Presumably one would be able to do a far better job at whatever they were doing when they are able to play back/slow down/pause different data channels from a trip at will? Because if the status quo is to poke at tablets in moving vehicles, how is anyone ok w/ cruise/waymo/whatever cars driving around SF?
- toast0 6y ago> how is anyone ok w/ cruise/waymo/whatever cars driving around SF? California DMV has shown a lot better oversight of self-driving than Arizona. They had deregistered several Uber owned vehicles in 2016 [1], and have some reasonably specific rules. It's much more OK in SF than AZ. [1] https://www.theregister.com/2016/12/22/uber_selfdriving_cars_san_francisco/ https://www.theregister.com/2016/12/22/uber_selfdriving_cars...