4 ms·
The issue of the gifs was actually discussed on discord. IIRC it was because the gifs would be to big in some cases.
by chabad360 6y ago
The issue of the gifs was actually discussed on discord. IIRC it was because the gifs would be to big in some cases.
- marksbrown 6y agoThat's a poor excuse given that a) mp4 support is pretty good these days and b) CSS already has responsive loading of assets. It's purely that to a man with a JS framework everything looks like a dynamic site. I highly recommend running Noscript to see how much of the Internet is broken because of this kind of nonsense.
- tssva 6y agoRunning Noscript doesn't show you how much of the internet is broken but instead is you purposefully breaking the internet for yourself.
- square_usual 6y agoYou don't need Javascript for static content.
- tssva 6y agoAnd dynamic content isn't broken content. Choosing to only view static content is a personal preference.
- SquareWheel 6y agoAgreed. Web standards exist between the server and client. If you break the standard (eg. by disabling JS), then it's your responsibility when things stop working. It's great that you have the freedom to do so, but you have no right to claim the website is "broken" as a result.