3 ms·
That's a very weak argument. It's basically based on if there was a secret extradition request, or the intention of having one filed when the opportunity presen
by radu_floricica 6y ago
That's a very weak argument. It's basically based on if there was a secret extradition request, or the intention of having one filed when the opportunity presented itself. Neither is even remotely provable.
What we have right now is clear revealed preference. Opportunity arose (leverage with Ecuador), US pushed, UK opened procedures. This is a very clear falsification of "what extradition? it's all about rape charges".
- ChrisKnott 6y agoHis own witness said at court that at the time of the rape accusation, there was no US extradition - so at this point it seems like it very much was "what extradition? it's all about rape charges"