4 ms·
The top solution on this Code Golf question is possibly the most comical example of Mathematica's scope that I've ever seen: https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/
by sellyme 6y ago
The top solution on this Code Golf question is possibly the most comical example of Mathematica's scope that I've ever seen: https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/71631/upgoat-or-downgoat https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/71631/upgoat-or...
- jtchang 6y agoThat answer is absurd yet awe inspiring what Mathematica can do.
- pmiller2 6y agoYeah, TIL Mathematica knows what a goat is, and can recognize one on sight.
- squibbles 6y agoThat statement really intrigued me. Since I like goats, I had to know how to do this. Use ImageInstanceQ[image, object], where image is the image and object is "caprine animal". [0] [1] [0] https://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/ImageInstanceQ.html https://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/ImageInstanceQ.ht... [1] https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/71631/upgoat-or-downgoat/71680#71680 https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/71631/upgoat-or...
- kiddico 6y agoThat's a very unique nerd-snipe you just experienced. https://xkcd.com/356/ https://xkcd.com/356/
- nullsense 6y agoTIL Mathematica is the GOAT.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- brobdingnagians 6y agoThe other answers are also very clever and interesting. There are quite a few ways to determine whether the goat is up or down, and some are very simple.
- leokennis 6y agoThe one that used reverse image search on Bing is so deliciously relatable. On the one hand, it's perfectly built to spec and satisfied all requirements given by the customer. On the other hand, you know it's incredibly fragile, and that the customer actually wants something different.