3 ms·
>These things are not at all equivalent. That's why I didn't say they were. I was challenging you to explain the moral difference and you haven't yet answered
by SilasX 6y ago
>These things are not at all equivalent.
That's why I didn't say they were. I was challenging you to explain the moral difference and you haven't yet answered that. Worse, you're not pretending that your coffee shop meeting isn't an interview, and is for their benefit:
>How else will they know they want to live with my family?
It's fine if you want to argue against the standard background check, but you need to actually articulate what is objectionable about it, and have some awareness of the similarities to the screening that you consider necessary.
- Pfhreak 6y ago> what is objectionable about it Background checks disproportionately impact poor and minority communities because they are more likely to be impacted by systemic poverty.