Don't focus on one guy. He is just one example. There is a pattern of a whole range of individuals with very credible credentials that are entirely ignored. Tr

Don't focus on one guy. He is just one example. There is a pattern of a whole range of individuals with very credible credentials that are entirely ignored. Track records don't seem to matter. The famous Imperial College model was by a worker with a rather alarming track record. How is the track record of Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, btw? Or the unqualified man currently serving as head of WHO? His C.V. is alarming enough. So side arguments aside, the question remains as to why Bill Gates, are granted such a global megaphone. The article from Columbia Review of Journalism tells us why that may be the case. I find it entirely irrational and unreasonable that decisions that will affect the entirety of humanity today, and will definitively alter the course of human development are to be made by individuals such as Bill Gates, and that other input by far more qualified individuals is entirely ignored, if not blackwashed. It not unreasonable to seek a second opinion even for relatively minor health matters. And here we are talking about metaphorical open heart surgery on the very nature of society: how we are governed, how we interact, and how we make collective decisions. There has never been a more timely moment to ASK QUESTIONS.