“are you advocating for continuing to follow a blog that is known to give misinformation because you like the writing style?” If you look at op’s comment, ther

“are you advocating for continuing to follow a blog that is known to give misinformation because you like the writing style?” If you look at op’s comment, there is no mention of style. I also have no visibility into misinformation from the blogger. Not sure that OP does either. With respect to his weather writing, he’s been around for quite a while and is perceived as authoritative. He had a radio show dedicated to the weather on NPR. This isn’t some rando with a blog. Questions you should have asked: “how do you feel about this posting where he makes this claim that is clearly misinformation?” You may be right about your above questions- but as an outsider looking at this thread, I don’t see why you believe the things you do and I don’t know why OP would ever agree to that phrasing. You assumed conflict rather than misunderstanding by asking ~“are you advocating reading misinformation because it’s well written?” Is a question that assumes someone knows your context. Trying not to be adversarial here- just underlining where reasonable people would not be super thrilled with the questioning style.