4 ms·
It has references for each claim, in the very end. Lot's of completely neutral scientists (such as inhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/340924249_Is_consi
by SomeoneFromCA 6y ago
It has references for each claim, in the very end. Lot's of completely neutral scientists (such as inhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/340924249_Is_considering_a_genetic-manipulation_origin_for_SARS-CoV-2_a_conspiracy_theory_that_must_be_censored https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340924249_Is_consid...) have voiced concerns about the dominant hypothesis of natural origin.
- YeGoblynQueenne 6y agoWith tongue firmly in cheek I have to ask you for evidence of the existence of such an entity as a "completely neutral scientist" :p
- SomeoneFromCA 6y agoI mean neutral in a sense that there is no obvious gain for them to fabricate the data.