3 ms·
I don't follow. Because China don't even implement a countrywide logistics-heavy service branch, they won't bother with a cheaper, localized solution?
by FeepingCreature 6y ago
I don't follow. Because China don't even implement a countrywide logistics-heavy service branch, they won't bother with a cheaper, localized solution?
- crazygringo 6y agoThe countrywide logistics-heavy solution provides actual benefits to residents with cleaner cities and rivers. The catch-it-at-the-mouth-of-the-river one doesn't. It would still be expensive, but benefit only the ocean, not residents. So sadly, yes -- I can't imagine why they'd bother.
- nobodyandproud 6y agoThe Chinese do eat seafood. They don’t sacrifice growth for the environment, but passing up something relatively simple (and extremely clever) like this? I can’t think of why they wouldn’t try it.
- quirkot 6y agoThis is the opposite of a localized solution. It attempts to do waste collection at an aggregated point. Where does all the waste go that doesn't end up in river with managed waste collection, is the issue