4 ms·
No source is unbiased, but rather than making an ad hominem attack, could you instead address the facts, describe in what way you think it unbiased and your evi
by agd 6y ago
No source is unbiased, but rather than making an ad hominem attack, could you instead address the facts, describe in what way you think it unbiased and your evidence for that.
- peteretep 6y agoHow in the heck are we meant to know what the facts are from a report written by someone who's claiming that the Salisbury poisonings were a false-flag by British Intelligence?
- marcus_holmes 6y agoI get how reading his attitude to the Salisbury poisonings could then cause some scepticism of his reporting of the Assange trial. I'm leaning the other way, though. His reporting of the Assange trial, plus his coverage of the Alex Salmond trial, and the various other things on his blog, have caused me to reconsider the Salisbury poisonings (and the UK's Russophobia in general). He's also being taken to court by the government on a ridiculous charge - always a sign that someone in power wants to shut him up.