4 ms·
Or perhaps a non peer reviewed paper funded by an organisation that is rabidly anti-Chinese needs to have its claims scrutinised heavily.
by singemonkey 6y ago
Or perhaps a non peer reviewed paper funded by an organisation that is rabidly anti-Chinese needs to have its claims scrutinised heavily.
- ethanwillis 6y agoDang, I have noticed tons of new accounts on HN in the past few months engaged in astro-turfing and personal attacks that don't contribute to the discussion and this one seems no different. - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24479464 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24479464
- robocat 6y agoFrom hn guidelines: “Please don't post insinuations about astroturfing, shilling, brigading, foreign agents and the like. It degrades discussion and is usually mistaken. If you're worried about abuse, email hn@ycombinator.com and we'll look at the data.”
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- logicchains 6y agoNo less than any paper funded by any organisations in China, which are rabidly anti-anything-that-could-reflect-badly-on-the-government.
- singemonkey 6y agoQuite possibly, but that's a world away from your original (and I'm paraphrasing here) "everyone thinks orange man and his associates are bad" comment. We do seem to agree that proper scrutiny of claims is important.