3 ms·
Haha this is really good :) I was never fond of this "serverless" naming, precisely because it could lead people to believe that there where actually no servers
by forty 6y ago
Haha this is really good :) I was never fond of this "serverless" naming, precisely because it could lead people to believe that there where actually no servers, but I had never seen such a good example of it :)
Oh and guess what, not only there are servers, but other people can run code on the same server as your code is running. Doesn't feel as safe suddenly ;)
Alternative phrasing: "This is hosted on Cloudflare Workers, and Cloudflare engineers are probably doing a better job running my code securely than I would"
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- waterhouse 6y ago> I was never fond of this "serverless" naming, precisely because it could lead people to believe that there where actually no servers Agreed. I think "server-agnostic" or "server-oblivious" would have been a better name.